

Accommodated/Non-accommodated Samples
- Prior to 1998, NAEP procedures for assessing reading did not permit the use of accommodations for special needs students who could not participate without them.
- In order to make the NAEP assessment more inclusive, beginning in 1998, new procedures were implemented to allow certain accommodations for special needs students. A split-sample design was used so that both administrative procedures-with accommodations and without accommodations-could be used during the same assessment, but with different samples of students.
- The split-sample design allows the reporting of trends across all the assessment years, as well as permitting an examination of the impact of permitting accommodations on overall results.
- Beginning in 2002, NAEP used only one set of procedures-permitting the use of accommodations. This policy was continued for the 2003 and 2005 reading assessments.
NAEP Reading Assessment Year Grades State Sample Accommodations Allowed 1992 4 Yes Entire sample No 1994 4, 8 Yes Entire sample No 1998 4, 8 Yes Split Sample No for random half
Yes for random half2000 4 No Split sample No for random half
Yes for random half2002 4, 8 Yes Entire sample Yes 2003 4, 8 Yes Entire sample Yes 2003 4, 8 Yes Entire sample Yes Interpreting comparisons between accommodated and non-accommodated samples
- Caution should be used in interpreting comparisons between accommodated and non-accommodated samples, e.g., between 1992 or 1994 results, and 2005 results.
- When accommodations were not permitted, students with disabilities and English language learners were not included in the assessment unless local school staff determined that they could be assessed meaningfully without accommodations. Therefore, in later assessments where accommodations were allowed, some students took the assessment that would have been excluded from previous assessments.
| Contexts for Reading -Target Distribution of Questions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade | Literary Experience | To Be Informed | To Perform a Task |
| 4 | 55% | 45% | NA |
| 8 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| Aspects of Reading -Target Distribution of Student Time | |||
| Grade | Forming a General Understanding/Developing Interpretation | Making Reader/Text Connections | Examining Content and Structure |
| 4 | 60% | 15% | 25% |
| 8 | 55% | 15% | 30% |
| Type of Question | Grade 4 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple-choice | 52 | 62 |
| Short, constructed response | 39 | 65 |
| Extended, constructed response | 8 | 15 |
| Total | 99 | 142 |
How are constructed-response questions scored?
How is the NAEP reading assessment administered?
How long does the NAEP assessment take?
What are the achievement level descriptions?
Policy definitions of NAEP Achievement Levels:
- Basic: This level denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade.
- Proficient: This level represents solid academic performance for each grade assessed. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter, including subject-matter knowledge, application of such knowledge to real-world situations, and analytical skills appropriate to the subject matter.
- Advanced: This level signifies superior performance.
NAEP Achievement Level descriptions for mathematics-set separately by grade
Grade 4
- Basic: Fourth-grade students performing at the Basic level should demonstrate an understanding of the overall meaning of what they read. When reading text appropriate for fourth-graders, they should be able to make relatively obvious connections between the text and their own experiences, and extend the ideas in the text by making simple inferences.
For example, when reading literary text, they should be able to tell what the story is generally about-providing details to support their understanding-and be able to connect aspects of the stories to their own experiences. When reading informational text, Basic-level fourth-graders should be able to tell what the selection is generally about or identify the purpose for reading it, provide details to support their understanding, and connect ideas from the text to their background knowledge and experiences.
- Proficient: Fourth-grade students performing at the Proficient level should be able to demonstrate an overall understanding of the text, providing inferential as well as literal information. When reading text appropriate to fourth grade, they should be able to extend the ideas in the text by making inferences, drawing conclusions, and making connections to their own experiences. The connections between the text and what the student infers should be clear.
For example, when reading literary text, Proficient-level fourth-graders should be able to summarize the story, draw conclusions about the characters or plot, and recognize relationships such as cause and effect. When reading informational text, Proficient-level students should be able to summarize the information and identify the author's intent or purpose. They should be able to draw reasonable conclusions from the text, recognize relationships such as cause and effect or similarities and differences, and identify the meaning of the selection's key concepts.
- Advanced: Fourth-grade students performing at the Advanced level should be able to generalize about topics in the reading selection and demonstrate an awareness of how authors compose and use literary devices. When reading text appropriate to fourth grade, they should be able to judge texts critically and, in general, give thorough answers that indicate careful thought.
For example, when reading literary text, Advanced-level students should be able to make generalizations about the point of the story and extend its meaning by integrating personal experiences and other readings with ideas suggested by the text. They should be able to identify literary devices such as figurative language.
When reading informational text, Advanced-level fourth-graders should be able to explain the author's intent by using supporting material from the text. They should be able to make critical judgments of the form and content of the text and explain their judgments clearly.
Grade 8
- Basic: Eighth-grade students performing at the Basic level should demonstrate a literal understanding of what they read and be able to make some interpretations. When reading text appropriate to eighth grade, they should be able to identify specific aspects of the text that reflect overall meaning, extend the ideas in the text by making simple inferences, recognize and relate interpretations and connections among ideas in the text to personal experience, and draw conclusions based on the text.
For example, when reading literary text, Basic-level eighth-graders should be able to identify themes and make inferences and logical predictions about aspects such as plot and characters. When reading informational text, they should be able to identify the main idea and the author's purpose. They should make inferences and draw conclusions supported by information in the text. They should recognize the relationships among the facts, ideas, events, and concepts of the text (e.g., cause and effect, order). When reading practical text, they should be able to identify the main purpose and make predictions about the relatively obvious outcomes of procedures in the text.
- Proficient: Eighth-grade students performing at the Proficient level should be able to show an overall understanding of the text, including inferential as well as literal information. When reading text appropriate to eighth grade, they should be able to extend the ideas in the text by making clear inferences from it, by drawing conclusions, and by making connections to their own experiences-including other reading experiences. Proficient eighth- graders should be able to identify some of the devices authors use in composing text.
For example, when reading literary text, students at the Proficient level should be able to give details and examples to support themes that they identify. They should be able to use implied as well as explicit information in articulating themes; to interpret the actions, behaviors, and motives of characters; and to identify the use of literary devices such as personification and foreshadowing. When reading informational text, they should be able to summarize the text using explicit and implied information and support conclusions with inferences based on the text. When reading practical text, Proficient-level students should be able to describe its purpose and support their views with examples and details. They should be able to judge the importance of certain steps and procedures.
- Advanced: Eighth-grade students performing at the Advanced level should be able to describe the more abstract themes and ideas of the overall text. When reading text appropriate to eighth grade, they should be able to analyze both meaning and form and support their analyses explicitly with examples from the text, and they should be able to extend text information by relating it to their experiences and to world events. At this level, student responses should be thorough, thoughtful, and extensive.
For example, when reading literary text, Advanced-level eighth-graders should be able to make complex, abstract summaries and theme statements. They should be able to describe the interactions of various literary elements (i.e., setting, plot, characters, and theme) and explain how the use of literary devices affects both the meaning of the text and their response to the author's style. They should be able to critically analyze and evaluate the composition of the text. When reading informational text, they should be able to analyze the author's purpose and point of view. They should be able to use cultural and historical background information to develop perspectives on the text and be able to apply text information to broad issues and world situations. When reading practical text, Advanced-level students should be able to synthesize information that will guide their performance, apply text information to new situations, and critique the usefulness of the form and content.
Source: National Assessment Governing Board. (2004) Reading Framework for the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC
Appendix A. Overview of Procedures Used for the NAEP 2005 Reading Assessment, State Report Generator. National Assessment Governing Board. (2004) Reading Framework for the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC
[2] See Appendix A, Overview of Procedures Used for the NAEP 2005 Reading Assessment for the actual distribution of questions and time for the 2005 assessment.